Digible CEO and Co-Founder Reid Wicoff with Lindsay Jacobs of Fairfield Residential, and Leslie Mathis of Woodfield Development.

At this year’s AIM Conference, one discussion kept returning to the same challenge: multifamily organizations have more data than ever, yet many teams still struggle to turn that information into better decisions.

That may sound surprising. After all, the industry has spent years investing in reporting platforms, attribution tools, CRM systems, property management software, and marketing technology designed to improve visibility. Data is everywhere.

The problem isn’t access to information. It’s making sure everyone is looking at the same picture.

During Behind the Curtain: How Sharing Anonymized Insights Makes Everyone Smarter, Digible CEO and Co-Founder Reid Wicoff joined leaders from Fairfield Residential and Woodfield Development to discuss what happens when marketing, operations, ownership groups, and vendor partners all operate from different dashboards, different KPIs, and different definitions of success. 

The answer is rarely dramatic, but it is expensive. Decisions take longer. Opportunities are missed. And teams often spend more time debating performance than improving it.

When Everyone Has Data but Nobody Has Alignment

One of the biggest themes from the discussion was that multifamily teams are not suffering from a lack of reporting. If anything, they’re navigating a constant stream of information flowing from marketing platforms, CRMs, PMS systems, operational tools, and vendor dashboards.

The challenge is determining which metrics matter most and how they connect to business outcomes.

A marketing team may be celebrating lower acquisition costs and increased lead volume while an operations team is focused on occupancy challenges. Ownership may be evaluating asset performance through NOI. None of these perspectives are wrong, but they can lead to very different conclusions about what’s actually working.

This is where data silos become costly. Not because information is missing, but because context is.

Without a shared understanding of success, teams often optimize for different outcomes. Reporting becomes fragmented, priorities compete for attention, and decision-making becomes more reactive than strategic.

Marketing’s Role Is Bigger Than Campaign Performance

One of the more interesting conversations centered on how the role of marketing continues to evolve.

Historically, multifamily marketers were often measured by leads, traffic, and campaign execution. Today, the expectation is much broader. Marketing teams are increasingly expected to influence leasing velocity, support pricing strategy, strengthen competitive positioning, and contribute to overall asset performance.

As Fairfield Residential’s Lindsay Jacobs noted during the discussion, marketers often “hold the keys to the success of the asset.”

That perspective changes the conversation.

If marketing has a direct impact on asset performance, then marketers need visibility beyond campaign metrics. They need to understand operational realities, market conditions, leasing performance, and ownership objectives. The most effective marketing teams are no longer operating as isolated service providers. They’re becoming strategic business partners.

Why Attribution Remains So Challenging

The panel also tackled a topic that continues to frustrate nearly everyone in the industry: attribution.

Today’s renter journey rarely follows a straight line. Prospects may discover a property through social media, revisit through paid search, compare options on listing sites, and ultimately convert after several interactions across multiple channels. Determining exactly which touchpoint deserves credit becomes increasingly difficult.

That’s why attribution models should be treated as decision-making tools rather than absolute truth.

As the panel bluntly summarized: “Garbage in, garbage out.” When data collection is inconsistent or incomplete, the decisions built on top of that information become less reliable as well.

Perfect attribution may never exist. Better alignment around what the data is telling us is often far more valuable.

Shared KPIs Create Better Conversations

One practical recommendation surfaced repeatedly throughout the discussion: establish shared KPIs across departments.

Many organizations spend significant time discussing reports but far less time defining success. Marketing, operations, ownership, and vendor partners each bring different perspectives, but they ultimately contribute to the same business outcomes.

For many operators, that shared objective begins with NOI.

Once teams align around common goals, individual metrics become easier to interpret. Marketing performance gains context. Operational insights become more actionable. Strategic discussions become less about defending numbers and more about improving results.

Just as importantly, teams begin speaking the same language.

Integrations Are Only Valuable If They Improve Decisions

Another important takeaway centered on integrations and technology.

The industry often evaluates integrations as feature checkboxes: Does the platform connect? Does the data transfer? Does the dashboard populate?

Those questions matter, but they miss the bigger issue.

Where is the data coming from? Which platform serves as the source of truth? How is the information being used once it arrives? These questions become increasingly important as multifamily organizations adopt more automation and AI-driven tools.

Technology can improve visibility, but visibility alone doesn’t create value. Better decisions do.

The Competitive Advantage Isn’t More Data

The multifamily industry will continue generating more information. Reporting platforms will improve. AI will help analyze larger volumes of data. Attribution models will become more sophisticated.

Yet the organizations that consistently outperform are unlikely to be the ones with the most dashboards.

They’ll be the ones that create alignment across marketing, operations, ownership, and vendor partners. They’ll establish shared goals, create transparency around performance, and focus less on collecting information and more on understanding what it means.

Because data can tell us what happened.

Alignment is what helps us decide what to do next.